Quantcast
Channel: Olivia Headlines on One News Page
Viewing all 14904 articles
Browse latest View live

Heather Graham, Ellen Burstyn to Star in Lifetime's 'Flowers in the Attic'

$
0
0
Lifetime is officially moving forward on its movie adaptation of the dark V.C. Andrews novel, "Flowers in the Attic," TheWrap has learned.

Heather Graham ("Boogie Nights,""Drugstore Cowboy") is set to play Corrine, the mother who abandons her four young children, leaving them with their truly messed up grandmother, Olivia, who, wait for it, will be played by Oscar, Golden Globe and Emmy winner Ellen Burstyn ("Political Animals,""Requiem for a Dream").

Related Articles: 
Darren Star to Direct Pilot for Lifetime's Alicia Silverstone Drama 'HR'
Ratings: 'Anna Nicole' Lures 3.3 Million Total Viewers for Lifetime
Ratings: Jodi Arias Movie Draws 3.1 Million Total Viewers
Image Caption: 
Getty Images

read more Reported by The Wrap 4 days ago.

Heather Graham Will Star In 'Flowers In The Attic'

$
0
0
Lifetime has ordered a TV movie adaptation of V.C. Andrews' "Flowers in the Attic," which will star Heather Graham and Ellen Burstyn, The Wrap reports.

Graham will play the recently widowed Corrine, who takes her four children (Chris, Cathy, Cory and Carrie) to stay with her parents at their mansion in Virginia. Because of a dark family secret, Corrine's mother, Olivia (Burstyn) insists that the four children must be kept locked in the attic where their grandfather won't see them, leaving them to care for themselves after Corrine's visits become increasingly infrequent. After years trapped alone together, the eldest children, Chris and Cathy, start taking a page out of Cersei and Jaime Lannister's playbook, if you know what we mean ...

The TV movie will be executive produced by Merideth Finn ("The Rite"), Michele Weiss ("Little Children") and Charles W. Fries ("Screamers"), Deborah Chow ("The High Cost of Living") is directing the script by "Up All Night's" Kayla Alpert.

Graham is best known for her film work, including "Boogie Nights,""The Hangover" and "Austin Powers: The Spy Who Shagged Me," and will guest star in the upcoming season of "Californication" as a woman who has a history with Hank. Oscar winner Burstyn was last seen in USA's shortlived "Political Animals."

*Will you watch Lifetime's "Flowers in the Attic"?* Reported by Huffington Post 4 days ago.

Salvia Plath: The Bardo Story

$
0
0
Michael Collins is a Baltimore musician with a fondness for making pun-happy drug references in the names he assumes for his recording projects. He had to give up his last moniker, Run DMT, to a dubstep crew of the same name, so now he's trying Salvia Plath on for size. The music is suited to a new name-- Collins has shed some of the chillwave tendencies that made Run DMT sink into a gauze-y morass of bands around the time of his Bong Voyage in 2009. Instead, he's chosen to bring his 60s psych influences into sharper focus, making everything just a little leaner, although low production values and sloppy playing are still key tenets of his sound. Underneath it all is a sharpening of Collins' songwriting skills, not quite turning The Bardo Story into the parent-friendly record he hoped for in a recent interview, but certainly lending a feeling that he's getting somewhere, one bong hit at a time.

Something that's immediately apparent from listening to this album is how well versed Collins is in 60s pop, both of the psychedelic variety and beyond. Initially it's hard to hear certain songs as anything other than pastiche, as so often happens when someone is deeply immersed in a particular era. Collins is the kind of guy who probably thinks that Lenny Kaye didn't dig hard enough when researching the Nuggets compilations. But, to be fair, he's not adverse to rooting around in the mainstream, finding plenty of room for inspiration in John Lennon's Beatles songs, pinching a sigh or two from the Beach Boys, even heading into the 70s to steal a few tricks from Randy Newman. He does it so well that it's hard not to be swayed in his direction, taking an approach reminiscent of another Newman acolyte, Chicago musician Liam Hayes (aka Plush), whose songwriting is so strong that he transcends the music he's so transparently sourcing.

Of course there are flaws, too. The Bardo Story is a messy album, riddled with a looseness that's either there on purpose or happens to be the consequence of Collins' admittedly limited skills. When he gets it to work, on the sunny foot-stomper "This American Life", for example, it's extremely endearing, coming off as the work of someone with a vision far beyond the audience this record is likely to attract. Collins might not be aspirational in that way, but there's a sense here that the grainy production values are becoming a hindrance rather than a valuable part of the picture, especially as he appears to have put a great deal of thought into the overall sound he's trying to express. He covers a decent swathe of ground, but the transitions are rarely jarring, even when he passes the baton from the swirling Olivia Tremor Control moves of "House of Leaves" to the spaghetti western whistle of "Stranded".

"Bardo" is a Tibetan word meaning "intermediate state," which provides a less-than subtle nudge toward the idea that this is a transitory album for Collins. It's a new name, a refinement of his vision. The great leaps it takes sometimes feel less like an aesthetic choice and more like the work of someone figuring out where they want to go. It's a cut above most public attempts to undertake such a journey, if indeed that's what Collins is doing. In among it all is a superior songwriter trying not to be wrestled out of the frame by all the limitations imposed upon him, including some spectacularly awful sub-Dali cover art. But even that's fitting in its way, a low rent imitation of Surrealism housing a collection of scuzzy sub-psych songs, all of which probably sounded like a great idea when conceptualized through a billow of weed smoke. Fortunately, it still sounds pretty good when the fog clears. Reported by Pitchfork 4 days ago.

Gal shot & killed at Dem sleepover site

$
0
0
A woman was shot to death at East Harlem’s Lincoln Houses yesterday — just days after the top Democratic mayoral candidates spent the night there to bring attention to the dangerous conditions.Olivia Brown, 23, was shot in the groin and hand by a woman with a Mohawk at Park... Reported by NY Post 4 days ago.

Munn thinks love for Wonder Woman wont win role

$
0
0
SINGAPORE (AP) - Olivia Munns love for Wonder Woman may be no secret, but the actress doesnt think shed be likely to play the superheroine on the big screen. The Chinese-American Munn says she likely wouldnt be considered due to her heritage as well as competition from bigger-name actresses. "It would be great, though, if the producers could make Wonder Woman an Asian-American, but thats probably not what they would do," Munn said. Reported by MyNorthwest.com 4 days ago.

Munn thinks love for Wonder Woman won't win role

$
0
0
- Olivia Munn's love for Wonder Woman may be no secret, but the actress doesn't think she'd be likely to play the superheroine on the big screen. Reported by WTOP 4 days ago.

Munn doubts over Wonder Woman role

$
0
0
Munn doubts over Wonder Woman role Olivia Munn's love for Wonder Woman may be no secret, but the actress doesn't think she'd be likely to play the superheroine on the big screen. Reported by Belfast Telegraph 4 days ago.

Sun, sea and text: NS Summer Reading 2013

$
0
0
Old, new, unexpected and beloved: our contributors recommend some essential summer reading.

Regular contributors and friends of the New Statesman sent us their ideas for the perfect summer reading - unlike other lists, we haven't limited them to recently published books, or even books you haven't read before ("summer is the time for rereading", John Burnside told us) meaning that the results are as intriguing and varied as the people who picked them. Click on a contributor's name below to go straight to their preferred summer read, or just scroll down to browse through the series.

Sheila Heti | Richard Curtis | Sarah Brown | Boris Johnson | Siddhartha Deb | Geoffrey Robertson | Andrew Mitchell | Jemima Khan | Mark Damazer | Danny Dorling | John Gray | John Bew | Mehdi Hasan | Christopher Reid | Robin Ince | Bryan Appleyard | Michael Gove | Jenny Diski | Sherard Cowper-Coles | A L Kennedy | Hadley Freeman | Alexandra Harris | John Burnside | Craig Raine | Olivia Laing | Tom Watson | Jane Shilling | Dylan Jones | Deborah Levy | Richard J Evans | Richard Mabey | Bella Freud | A A Gill | Douglas Alexander | Leo Robson | Nicholas Lezard | Sarah Churchwell | Claire Lowdon | Rachel Cooke | Antonia Quirke | Kate Mossman | Bim Adewunmi | Alex Preston | Claire Tomalin | Ian Stewart | Nina Caplan | Isabel Hilton

*  *

* Sheila Heti*

Eat Me: the Food and Philosophy of Kenny Shopsin (Knopf, $24.95) by Kenny Shopsin and Carolynn Carreno may look like just a cookbook but it’s secretly an experimental autobiography, formed from the words of Kenny Shop­sin, who owned the Lower East Side culinary institution, Shopsin’s. His greasy spoon had an eccentric list of rules on its menu and Kenny had a penchant for throwing out ­customers he didn’t like. The recipes are fun to read and follow, as are Shopsin’s entertaining musings on family, customer service and eggs. It’s a formally and culinarily inspiring book.

* Richard Curtis*

Adam Hochschild’s Bury the Chains (Pan, £9.99) about the abolition of slavery is the only history book I’ve read since school and a primer for anyone interested in changing the world – all the ups and downs, the need for epic patience, the use of civil and parliamentary pressure. At the centre of it is the fabulous figure of Thomas Clarkson, a giant red-head, who one day stopped by a roadside having written an essay at university on the issue of slavery and said to himself: “If the contents of the essay are true, it is time some person should see these calamities to their end.” And then spent his life doing just that.

* Sarah Brown*

The true story of the rise, perilous fall and spectacular rise again of anything makes for a good read. When the subject is Lego, it makes it universally compelling. As a mum, a global education activist and a manager, I have every reason to need Brick by Brick: How Lego Rewrote the Rules of Innovation and Conquered the Toy Industry by David Robertson (Random House, £18.99). As the number one toy in the world, the Lego “biography” has to appeal to everyone this summer in between the political tomes and the hot beach reads.

* Boris Johnson*

This summer’s most sizzling beach read is unquestionably The UN Environmental Programme: the First Forty Years by Stanley P Johnson (UNEP, $30).

* Siddhartha Deb*

A few months ago, I finally sat down with ­Patricia Highsmith’s The Talented Mr Ripley (Vintage, £8.99), wanting to read something paced quickly, yet not entirely driven by plot. It fulfilled my expectations; it moves swiftly but Ripley grows in complexity, becoming enigmatic even as his motives grow more transparent. The novel is also a warped travel book, a twisted version of the ever-potent theme of Americans abroad, and, most of all, a wonderful variation on the idea of reinventing the modern self. All the grand tourist sights and experiences are here but shot through with anxiety, violence and friendships laced with self-interest and cruelty.

* Geoffrey Robertson*

The war of American independence has been relatively ignored by British history courses and historians, probably because Britain was defeated. Andrew O’Shaughnessy’s The Men Who Lost America (Oneworld, £30) is an important reminder that this was not the result of any failure of generalship but the arrogance and ignorance of a ruling class unable to comprehend how fiercely people will fight for their rights. The valour of the patriots comes out all too clearly in Nathaniel Philbrick’s Bunker Hill: a City, a Siege, a Revolution (Doubleday, £14.99), which would make a good companion volume.

* Andrew Mitchell*

Edward Stourton’s Cruel Crossing: Escaping Hitler across the Pyrenees (Doubleday, £20) is a brilliantly researched tale of personal bravery, risk, Nazi brutality and occasional acts of French perfidy. It is moving, too, as we hear first-hand accounts from a dying generation who lived through extraordinary times and whose memories we should harvest and cherish as Stourton so clearly does. He also encourages us to ask the question: what would we have done if faced with an escaper who needed our help? Many of those who did help were women who took extraordinary risks and who often paid the ultimate price.

* Jemima Khan*

Moth Smoke (Penguin, £8.99) is the less well-known first novel by Mohsin Hamid, the Man Booker-shortlisted author of The Reluctant Fundamentalist. It’s a classic postcolonial counterpunch against the stereotyped depictions of Pakistan by Orientalists, “Raj revivalists” and Fox News. Hamid chooses to focus not on the familiar bearded fanatics but instead on Pakistan’s degenerate ruling elite. He unlocks an unknown but powerful section of Pakistani society, with his untranslatable words, literally translated Punjabi insults, vernacular histories, references to the Quran, to eastern literature and, in particular, to the Urdu classical poetry, known as ghazals, from which the title is derived.

* Mark Damazer*

If you want to go long, chunky and serious – go for Vasily Grossman’s Life and Fate (Vintage Classics, £9.99), the great 20th-century Russian novel. A wonderful humane penetration of war and totalitarianism, fit to sit alongside Tolstoy, and a book that petrified the Soviet establishment – who suppressed it. Lighter – Penelope Fitzgerald’s The Blue Flower (Flamingo, £8.99), a beautiful evocation of obsessive love and mores in late-18th-century Germany, with not a wasted word.

* Danny Dorling*

If you want something a little dense, then I’d suggest Questioning Collapse: Human Resil­ience, Ecological Vulnerability, and the Aftermath of Empire, edited by Patricia A Mc­Anany and Norman Yoffee (Cambridge Uni- versity Press, £18.47). The book collects together criticisms of some of Jared Diamond’s claims in Collapse: How Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed. These myths of past self-­inflicted collapse make us far more fearful about our own chances of societal survival. Alternatively, if it’s been a long year and you want a rest try Some Dogs Do by Jez Alborough (Walker Books, £5.99). It helps to have a child to read it to, but that’s far from essential.

* John Gray*

The most extraordinary work of fiction I’ve read in a long time is Stoner (Vintage Classics, £8.99) by John Williams. First published in 1965, it is one of the lost masterpieces of American – and world – literature, only now being rediscovered. It’s the story of an entire life, from birth to the moment of death, of a seemingly nondescript human being – a boy from a poor Missouri farming family, who enters college to study agriculture, is bewitched by literature and spends the rest of his days teaching the subject. If you’re looking for a book that’s simple and subtle, warmly human and at the same time utterly pitiless in its rendition of the vicissitudes of an ordinary existence, here’s one you will read again and again.

* John Bew*

If you want to understand what has happened in Egypt from the fall of the former President Mubarak to the recent ousting of the Muslim Brotherhood by the country’s military you could do worse than start with the The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon (Arc Manor, £3.99). Karl Marx’s 1852 essay explained how the revolution of 1848 was overturned “like a thunderbolt from a clear blue sky” by a military coup led by Napoleon’s nephew Louis. “Easy come, easy go,” wrote Marx in a masterly analysis of the socio-economic tensions and rural-urban divide that showed how Napoleon III could actually claim much more popular legitimacy than the government he dismissed.

* Mehdi Hasan*

Who better to offer a book-length riposte to Richard Dawkins and his faith-hating, God-bashing, “new atheist” fanboys than the noted US cell biologist – and practising Roman Catholic – Kenneth Miller? Miller’s Finding Darwin’s God (HarperPerennial, £8.99) takes on both Christian creationists and those atheistic materialists who claim Darwin rendered religion irrelevant. “Evolution is the key to understanding our relationship with God,” he writes.

* Christopher Reid*

Bernard Spencer (1909-1963) lived and worked in Greece, Egypt, Spain and Austria, but his poems are less exotic than idiosyncratic in their unpredictable angles of view and ways of saying. I love his outsider’s stance and cultivated awkwardness, though it is perhaps just such qualities of not fitting in that have doomed him to be less widely appreciated than he should be. Peter Robinson’s edition of his Complete Poetry, Translations and Selected Prose (Bloodaxe, £15) reminds us how good Spencer can be: the ideal travelling companion, noticing more than you do and finding exactly the right, startling phrase to point things out.

* Robin Ince*

As someone with a habit of waffling and using five words when two will do, I am in awe of Dan Rhodes’s brevity. He is the master of the very, very short story. In Marry Me (Canongate, £8.99), he condenses stories of melancholy, failure, romance and ridiculousness into a few sentences. Reading this book will also mean you have time for another and so use that time for Stuart Fire­stein’s Ignorance: How It Drives Science (Oxford University Press, £14.99) – like Rhodes, he is both concise and splendidly aphoristic.

* Bryan Appleyard*

I’m not a fan of big, dumb beach reads. I prefer small, smart ones. Nothing could be smaller and smarter than Kay Ryan’s The Niagara River (Grove Press Poetry, £9.99). Ryan was America’s poet laureate, a grand title for such a devoted miniaturist but a deserved one. You can find here traces of Emily Dickinson and Elizabeth Bishop, but most of all such intensity of ­focus and high craft that you will gasp on every page. And you will be reminded, even on the beach, that “Everything contains some/silence”.

* Michael Gove*

Ned Beauman is the best young novelist in Britain. Boxer, Beetle (Sceptre, £8.99) and The Teleportation Accident (Sceptre, £8.99) are two of the most brilliantly inventive, and hilarious, things I’ve read all year. The only work that stands comparison – for both ­quality of writing and wit – is Roger Lewis’s What am I Still Doing Here? (Coronet, £8.99) – which also manages to be both winningly self-pitying and moving.

* Jenny Diski*

If summer reading means you have time to become fully absorbed in a narrative and delighted by prose, then go for it by reading or rereading Henry James’s What Maisie Knew (Wordsworth Classics, £1.99). The answer is everything and nothing. What James knew was about point of view. Maisie sees everything but knows less than the reader observing her observations. He explores the chasm and reverberations between the child who helplessly sees and barely understands, and the far from grown-up adults who use her as a screen for projection and cover. Brilliant, lush, funny and totally unsentimental.

* Sherard Cowper-Coles*

There is only one book that anyone worried about the state of the world should be reading this summer: Barbara W Tuchman’s magisterial The March of Folly (Abacus, £15.99). In this examination of stupidity in statesmanship from Troy to Vietnam, via the Renaissance popes and the American uprising against rule from London, the great American historian asks why experienced statesmen behave so foolishly. She concludes that, faced with a choice between what is right but unpalatable in the short term and what is less difficult today but leads to long-term catastrophe, politicians almost invariably opt for jam today and disaster ­tomorrow. Sobering diplomatic medicine, ­administered in the most beautiful prose.

* A L Kennedy*

I would recommend Pack My Bag (Vintage Classics, £8.99), Henry Green’s wonderfully-crafted autobiography. I don’t even like autobiography but I loved this from the first. It’s a piercingly honest book about a young man’s fears and failings as he grows up in an English public school and sees the bloodbath of the First World War sweep away each senior year. In a Britain freshly obsessed with public-school values and about to commemorate the 100th anniversary of the Great War’s outbreak, I can think of few better reads.

* Hadley Freeman*

Beautiful Ruins (Viking, £8.99) by Jess Walter is a heavenly summery read. The novel skips between 1960s Italy and modern-day Hollywood – and surely everyone likes to read about those times and places – with extra stop-offs in between. When you read it, you can’t believe no one’s thought of this plot before; when you finish, you marvel at how on earth Walter pulled it off.

* Alexandra Harris*

Here’s a counter-intuitive choice for summer: The Idea of North by Peter Davidson (Reaktion, £16.95), a book of cool greys and pale, late dawns, ice gods and ghostly shivers. It’s one of the most beautiful books I’ve read this year. If you get over-hot on a crowded beach, what better than to think of Eric Ravilious’s crystalline watercolours of the Arctic circle, see in your mind’s eye the stillness of a winter sunset, feel the loneliness of a Scandinavian seafarer. Davidson’s taste is both baroque and ascetic; his prose is correspondingly extravagant and refined. This is cultural history at its very best, unfolding new maps of imagination.

* John Burnside*

For me, summer is a time for rereading. This year, I am going back to Malcolm X, via By Any Means Necessary (Pathfinder Books, £11), a collections of his speeches, partly because I am researching a novel that touches (very briefly) on the civil rights struggle, but mostly because I love how Malcolm brings a perfect balance of passion and reason to his analyses of all that was, and continues to be, wrong with a profoundly unjust society.

* Craig Raine*

Two outstanding novels. Mark Haddon’s The Red House (Vintage, £7.99) – expertly, quietly polyphonic and studded with precise images: a rocket vanishing with “a fizz like Velcro”; the thorn-bush of sparks from a Zippo lighter. Zadie Smith’s superb NW (Penguin, £7.99) is all about undertow, the inescapable pull of one’s past. No one writes better dialogue. Very good group sex scenes – impeccably imagined in all their anonymous, difficult actuality.

* Olivia Laing*

I spent much of last winter working through the gargantuan The Andy Warhol Diaries, edited by Pat Hackett (Penguin Modern Classics, £20), and it strikes me now that I missed a trick: they’re made for reading on a lilo in someone else’s pool. Warhol is the emperor of gossip and he dishes merrily on the demi-monde of 1970s and 1980s New York, from Jackie Kennedy to Bianca Jagger. Don’t be fooled by the breathless tone, though. Nothing escapes Andy, and his portraits of deviants, disco kids and minor royals makes for one of the greatest diaries I’ve ever read.

* Tom Watson*

For a lazy sunny day by the river, I recommend Siddhartha (Penguin Modern Classics, £9.99), Herman Hesse’s short novel about a journey to enlightenment. In the emotionally stunted world of Westminster, Siddhartha almost acts as a self-help guide to those seeking a gentler, more tender politics. To Hesse “Opinions mean nothing; they may be beautiful or ugly, clever or foolish, anyone can embrace or reject them” – leading a selfless life is what matters. In such hard times, there’s something in those words.

* Jane Shilling*

As a teenager, paralysed with ennui, I devoured the novels of Colette, entranced by their exhilarating mixture of sensuality and severity. Then I read a biography, which made me dislike her, and I stopped reading her for a time. But recently, I picked up Earthly Paradise (available second-hand), a collection of her autobiographical writing, and fell in love again. The tension between the glitter of her prose and the sturdiness of her technique is irresistible. It makes you happy and then it makes you think. What more could one ask?

* Dylan Jones*

Ringolevio: a Life Played for Keeps by Emmett Grogan (NYRB Classics, £8.99) is one of my favourite books, a classic tale of American self-invention by one of San Francisco’s original anarchist group, the Diggers. Grogan was one of the figureheads of the West Coast movement in the mid Sixties and this book – some of which is true – charts his rise to infamy. The Diggers were devoted to genuine egalitarianism and involved themselves in street theatre, direct action and distributing free food. This is their story as much as Grogan’s and is one of the most fascinating books ever written about Sixties counterculture.

* Deborah Levy*

When the Mona Lisa was stolen from the Louvre in 1911, people queued to gaze at the empty space on the wall where she had once been on display. What were they looking for? Always brilliantly provocative, in Stealing the Mona Lisa: What Art Stops Us from Seeing (Shoemaker & Hoard, £11.99 ) Darian Leader asks a question we might all recognise: is it true that when we lose something or someone, they often become more desirable to us? I first read this book ten years ago and I’m still thinking about it.

* Richard J Evans*

The centenary of the outbreak of the First World War comes up in just over a year’s time and there’s no better way of preparing for it than by reading Christopher Clark’s magnificent narrative history of the diplomatic manoeuvres that ended in catastrophe, The Sleepwalkers (Penguin, £10.99). It’s compulsively readable and thoroughly entertaining, full of anecdotes and character sketches. It will be hard to beat.

* Richard Mabey*

Required summer reading? Indubitably Adam Gopnik’s frost-sparkling essay collection Winter: Five Windows on the Season (Quercus, £18.99). His unexpected revelation that we’ve all had a long love affair with the season we claim to hate – Wordsworth’s solitary night-skating, the obsession with Polar exploration, the imperative psychological and cultural reasons why Christmas must occur in winter – will make you positively look forward to the dismalness that is now probably only a couple of months away.

* Bella Freud*

Rupert Everett’s second volume of memoirs, The Vanished Years (Abacus, £8.99), is just as hilarious and fascinating as his brilliantly titled first book, Red Carpets and Other Banana Skins. He seems to have done rather a lot during the vanished years. My favourite of his doomed projects is his pilot for a US television series called Mr Ambassador, based on the antics of a fictional English ambassador who specialises in that deadpan British perverse behaviour that is very much Everett’s own style. There are many brilliantly bitchy stories and no one is spared – including the author. Just when his petulant selfishness begins to alienate you, he reels you back in with his honesty and caring.

* A A Gill*

Perilous Question (Weidenfeld & Nicolson, £20) by Antonia Fraser. The story of the passing of the Great Reform Bill of 1832 is one of those milestones in political history that I blithely refer to but know precious little about. From the first paragraph Fraser renders it a compelling drama with a cast of characters as awful, marvellous, duplicitous, self-seeking and public-spirited as any that Dickens invented. The parallels with today are glaring and the lessons still only partially learned, the consequences as yet not fully redeemed. The brilliance of Fraser is that she sees everything first in human terms – this is history made by people for people and it’s the people that dance, posture and rise with a moving grandeur off the page.

* Douglas Alexander*

Foreign Policy Begins At Home (Basic Books, £17.99) by Richard Haas is as provocative as it is insightful. The book asks the question of what should US foreign policy look like after a “decade of war”? Haas, the long-serving president of the Council on Foreign Relations, argues that the focus for policymakers should be rebuilding the domestic strength of the US at a time of China’s continuing rise.

* Leo Robson*

V F Perkins’s Film as Film: Understanding and Judging Movies, published in 1972 and still in print (Da Capo, £9.99), is probably the book I know best. An attempt to replace theories with criteria, it contains miracles of observation and phrasing on every page. I once heard Perkins say that he is a celebrity to about 30 people, and while the number may not be much higher, his status is closer to deity.

* Nicholas Lezard*

I recommend Derek Robinson’s sequence of RAF flying novels, all reprinted by MacLehose Press. His latest, A Splendid Little War (£18.99), set in the Russian post-revolutionary civil war, is perhaps even better than his first and most famous, Goshawk Squadron, which Saul Bellow wanted to win the Booker Prize when he was a judge. It’s not out in paperback yet but the sheer quality of the prose and bleakly comic moral vision will make you wish it was twice as long.

* Sarah Churchwell*

The investigative journalist who broke the MPs’ expenses story, Heather Brooke, has long been a fierce campaigner for government transparency. In last year’s The Revolution Will Be Digitised (Windmill, £8.99), she used her experiences of WikiLeaks and hackers, including her personal encounters with Julian Assange, to explore the ethical questions – surveillance, freedom of speech, security – facing us all in a digital age. In the summer of Edward Snowden, her story has only become more timely.

* Claire Lowdon*

Two novels facing in opposite directions: William Golding’s The Inheritors (Faber & Faber, £7.99) looks back to the time of Neanderthal man, while Russell Hoban’s Ridley Walker (Bloomsbury, £8.99) fast-forwards 2,000 years to a post-apocalyptic civilisation living through a second iron age – in Kent. Golding and Hoban give us dispatches from another form of consciousness. The Inheritors is voiced for Lok, a Neanderthal man with limited language. Walker himself narrates Hoban’s book, in an ingeniously corrupt version of modern English. Both works are under-read masterpieces, requiring patience and attention from the reader, and rewarding that patience with their extraordinary, enduring beauty.

* Rachel Cooke*

Holiday reading, if all goes according to plan, is uninterrupted reading. So my advice is to take with you a short book which can - and probably should - be read in single day: A Month in the Country by J Carr (Penguin, £7.99). The word ‘masterpiece’ is so over-used, but this novel, about a veteran of World War I who finds himself restoring a church fresco in a Yorkshire village, and which was shortlisted for the Booker Prize in 1980, could not really be described as anything else. It’s beautiful, and incredibly wise, the lesson being that happiness and pain are often inextricably linked - something that we 21st century types all too often tend to forget.

* Antonia Quirke*

Gavin Maxwell's A Reed Shaken By The Wind: Travels Among The Marsh Arabs of Iraq (Eland, £12.99) is a witty and deeply unusual memoir of a journey taken with the pompous explorer Alfred Thesiger in 1955 to Basra and then beyond, to live amongst the reed dwellers of the lower reaches of The Tigris, a great marshy expanse of unmapped lagoon where they lived in little villages of reed huts built upon floating islands like dabchicks nests. Inexplicably, Maxwell has dropped out of literary history: a tricky man in real life and once a star of the Special Operations Executive, he had taught spies to make edible maps and kill people with their shoelaces before going on to be a shark hunter, amongst other things. Always a recluse, Maxwell made no attempt to foster professional relationships or toady to publishers. But any fans of his masterpiece Ring of Bright Water (which he wrote next) will love discovering here Maxwell's first otters, given to him by tribesmen, one of whom (a previously unknown species) he smuggles back adoringly to Scotland. Maxwell is our greatest travel writer and this lost book is a complete thrill.

* Kate Mossman*

Kendra is a teenage girl in Tucson, Arizona, spending the summer weightlifting and trying to improve her grammar on a community school programme. Merv works at a waterpark and passes his days at the top of a lifeguard's tower, wondering about the old man in the wheelchair who comes to the pool fully-clothed every day. Modern Ranch Living (Bloomsbury, £7.99) is a unique picture of life in a city that is almost too hot to bear, where two loners wait for the monsoon to come and shake things up a bit. Raised in Tucson, now a scriptwriter and teacher at Columbia University, Mark Poirier is one of America's funniest and most compassionate voices.

* Bim Adewunmi*

CLR James’ Letters From London (Signal Books, £10.99) were first published back home in Trinidad, in the Port Of Spain Gazette, in 1932, and they are remarkable, both as historical documents and also as works of 'writer as performer'. He's only 31 here, and a bit of a show-off - he delights, for example, in impressing Edith Sitwell at a Bloomsbury salon. But there are insights also - into racism, society, the first stirrings of feminism, and the chasm that lies between Britain and her empire. You could probably finish this in an hour - you'll be charmed.

* Alex Preston*

Before my holidays proper, I’m heading out to Nigeria to write a piece on the militant terrorist oragnisation Boko Haram. If and when I return from war-torn Maiduguri, I’ll spend a month in the south of Spain nursing my wounds and reading Chimananda Ngozi Adichie’s Americanah (Fourth Estate, £20) which sounds wonderful. I’ll also pack a copy of Laurent Binet’s HHhH in French (Grasset & Fasquelle, $25) – it stunned me in English and I can’t wait to revisit it in the original. Finally, some Trollope, perhaps his strange 1980s-set science-fiction novel The Fixed Period (Norilana Books, £6) which predicts, among other things, mobile phones and podcasting.

* Claire Tomalin*

The book I've greatly enjoyed lately is an old one, The Making Of The English Landscape (Little Toller Books, £12) by the historian WG Hoskins. First published in 1955, and an inspiration to WH Auden, it was a revolutionary step in topographical writing, as William Boyd explains in his introduction, and makes you look at landscape and townscape with new eyes.

* Ian Stewart*

According to the literati, Vonnegut didn’t write science fiction. Neither did Dick, Bradbury, Le Guin, Ballard... or, bizarrely, Asimov, whose novels about a collapsing Galactic Empire have suddenly mutated into mainstream literature. Brian Aldiss has always been a wonderful writer, so he must be a good bet for future SF-denial. He’s in the Science Fiction Hall of Fame, but that won’t stop them. Finches of Mars (The Friday Project, £14.99) is about a Martian colony whose new-born children never survive. Dare I mention that despite being well-written and having realistic characters, it’s science fiction? At least, until the revisionists get their hands on it.

* Nina Caplan*

I intended to suggest Stacy Schiff’s extraordinary Cleopatra (Virgin Books, £7.99), a biography of the stature of the Pyramids – especially given the desert of reliable material she had to work with. Those who wish to understand Egypt can profitably start there. But then Alice Munro announced, at 82, that she was quitting writing, and so I must recommend that anyone who doesn’t yet know what a loss that is tries her piercing stories Hateship, Friendship, Courtship, Loveship, Marriage (Chatto & Windus, £8.99), set in her native Canada, every one of which glows like a medieval map. Less an accurate portrayal of the world around us than a superb and moving evocation of the profound inaccuracies, mythical marvels and near-misses that come with being human.

* Isabel Hilton*

So many good books this year, but I would recommend The Walls of Delhi (UWA Publishing, £24.99). Most of us have read and enjoyed the rich offerings in English by Indian or Indian born writers, but not so much reaches us from writers in the vernacular. This sensitive translation of three tales by Hindi poet and journalist Uday Prakash offers the reader a very different understanding of India and a glimpse of the lives and points of view of the non-English speaking majority. Reported by New Statesman 18 hours ago.

What drives writers to drink?

$
0
0
Tennessee Williams, F Scott Fitzgerald, Hemingway, Cheever, Carver, Berryman… Six giants of American literature – and all addicted to alcohol. In an edited extract from her new book, The Trip to Echo Spring, Olivia Laing looks at the link between writers and the bottle

In the small hours of 25 February 1983, the playwright Tennessee Williams died in his suite at the Elysée, a small, pleasant hotel on the outskirts of the Theatre District in New York City. He was 71: unhappy, a little underweight, addicted to drugs and alcohol and paranoid sometimes to the point of delirium. According to the coroner's report, he'd choked on the bell-shaped plastic cap of a bottle of eyedrops, which he was in the habit of placing on or under his tongue while he administered to his vision.

The next day, the New York Times ran an obituary claiming him as "the most important American playwright after Eugene O'Neill", though it had been two decades since his last successful play. It listed his three Pulitzer prizes, for A Streetcar Named Desire, Cat on a Hot Tin Roof and Night of the Iguana, adding: "He wrote with deep sympathy and expansive humour about outcasts in our society. Though his images were often violent, he was a poet of the human heart."

He was also a kind, generous, hard-working man, who rose at dawn almost every morning of his life, sitting down at his typewriter with a cup of black coffee to produce what would amount to well over 100 short stories and plays. At the same time, he was a lonely, depressed alcoholic who managed by degrees to isolate himself from almost everyone he loved. A sample entry from his diary in 1957 reads: "Two Scotches at bar. 3 drinks in morning. A daiquiri at Dirty Dick's, 3 glasses of red wine at lunch and 3 of wine at dinner. Also two seconals so far, and a green tranquillizer whose name I do not know and a yellow one I think is called reserpine or something like that"– an itemisation made more troubling by the fact that he was in rehab at the time.

Things got worse in 1963, when Williams's long-term partner Frank Merlo, nicknamed the Little Horse, died of lung cancer. After that, he was far gone and out, barely perpendicular against the current, buoyed on a diet of coffee, liquor, barbiturates and speed. Hardly any wonder he found speech difficult, or kept toppling over in bars, theatres and hotels. Each year he put on a new play, and each year it failed, rarely lasting a month before it closed.

Two years before he died, Williams was interviewed in the Paris Review. He talked about his work and the people he had known, and he touched too, a little disingenuously, on the role of alcohol in his life, saying: "O'Neill had a terrible problem with alcohol. Most writers do. American writers nearly all have problems with alcohol because there's a great deal of tension involved in writing, you know that. And it's all right up to a certain age, and then you begin to need a little nervous support that you get from drinking."

While not all of this statement is wholly to be believed, it's true that Williams was by no means the only alcoholic writer in America, or anywhere else for that matter. Ernest Hemingway. F Scott Fitzgerald. William Faulkner. John Cheever. Patricia Highsmith. Truman Capote. Dylan Thomas. Jack London. Marguerite Duras. Elizabeth Bishop. Jean Rhys. Hart Crane. These are among the greatest writers of our age, and yet, like Williams, their addiction to alcohol damaged their creativity, ravaged their relationships and drove many of them to death.

Why do writers drink? Discussing Edgar Allan Poe, Baudelaire once commented that alcohol had become a weapon "to kill something inside himself, a worm that would not die". In his introduction to Recovery, the posthumously published novel of the poet John Berryman, Saul Bellow observed: "Inspiration contained a death threat. He would, as he wrote the things he had waited and prayed for, fall apart. Drink was a stabiliser. It somewhat reduced the fatal intensity." In Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, Williams explains the desire even more succinctly. Towards the end of the play, Brick, the former football hero, tells his father that he needs to keep drinking until he hears "the click…This click that I get in my head that makes me peaceful. I got to drink till I get it." Horrified, Big Daddy grabs his son's shoulders, exclaiming: "Why boy, you're alcoholic."

I was 17 when I first read that sentence, and already well acquainted with alcoholism. My mother's partner for a decade, Diana, had been a drinker, and our time together had recently ended in disaster, when the police came to our home and arrested her after a violent altercation. It wasn't just the fights that had frightened me, but rather the terrifying sense that someone was no longer inhabiting consensual reality. I was traumatised, I suppose, and it's hard to express the relief I experienced when I opened up my pale green copy of Cat and found within its pages a brave, brazen account of the role alcohol can play within a family; a house. Ever since that afternoon, I've been preoccupied by what writers have to say about drinking, especially those who have been drinkers themselves.

Over time, I grew most interested in six American writers whose lives intersected in odd, sometimes uncanny ways. All but one had – or saw themselves as having – that most Freudian of pairings, an overbearing mother and a weak father. All were tormented by self-hatred and a sense of inadequacy. Three were profoundly promiscuous, and almost all experienced conflict and dissatisfaction with regard to their sexuality. Most died in middle age, and the deaths that weren't suicides tended to be directly related to the years of hard and hectic living. At times, all tried in varying degrees to give up alcohol but only two succeeded, late in life, in becoming permanently dry.

These sound like tragic lives, the lives of wastrels or dissolutes, and yet these six men – Tennessee Williams, Ernest Hemingway, F Scott Fitzgerald, John Cheever, John Berryman and Raymond Carver – produced between them some of the most beautiful writing this world has ever seen. As the novelist Jay McInerney once commented of Cheever: "There have been thousands of sexually conflicted alcoholics but only one of them wrote The Housebreaker of Shady Hill and The Sorrows of Gin." I wanted to know how their writing and drinking had intertwined, and so in 2011 I took a trip across America. Over the course of a month I travelled by plane and train across the country, drifting from New York to New Orleans, Key West, St Paul and Port Angeles. I chose these places because they seemed to serve as staging posts, in which the successive phases of alcohol addiction had been acted out. By travelling through them in sequence, I thought it might be possible to build a kind of topographical map of alcoholism, tracing its developing contours from the pleasures of intoxication through to the gruelling realities of the drying-out process.

I went to New York in search of first drinks. Tennessee Williams took his at sea in the summer of 1928: a green crème de menthe, somewhere on the greyish Atlantic between Manhattan and Southampton. He was still called Tom back then, a skinny, shy boy of 17, travelling with his grandfather and a party of parishioners on a grand tour of Europe. Afterwards he was violently sea sick, later confiding in a letter to his mother that though his grandfather was lapping up the cocktails, his own preference was for Coca-Cola and ginger ale. The pleasures of abstinence soon palled. By the time they reached Paris, he'd discovered champagne.

Tom had been a sickly, delicate boy, and as a teenager began to suffer the panic attacks that would dog him until the very last days of his life. At first he used to self-medicate by pacing the streets of St Louis or swimming frantic lengths in a nearby pool. But as he grew older and moved to New York, sex and alcohol became his preferred methods of managing stress. In his autobiography, Memoirs, he remembered how after drinking wine "you felt as if a new kind of blood had been transfused into your arteries, a blood that swept away all anxiety and all tension for a while, and for a while is the stuff that dreams are made of".

He was by no means the only writer who used alcohol in this way. The same trick was employed by John Cheever, one of the greatest short-story writers of his or any century. Cheever fascinated me because he was, in common with many alcoholics, a helpless mixture of fraudulence and honesty. Though he feigned patrician origins, his upbringing in Quincy, Massachusetts was both financially and emotionally insecure, and while he eventually attained all the trappings of the landed Wasp he never managed to shake a painful sense of shame and self-disgust.

He was an almost exact contemporary of Williams, and though they weren't friends, their worlds in New York often overlapped. In fact, Mary Cheever first realised her husband wasn't entirely heterosexual when they attended the first Broadway production of A Streetcar Named Desire. According to Cheever, Blake Bailey's beautiful biography, there was a leitmotif associated with Blanche DuBois's dead homosexual husband and this tune lodged in Mary's head and led to some kind of underwater realisation that her husband's sexuality was not as she'd assumed, though this wasn't a thought she shared with him.

Cheever's problem, as anyone familiar with his journals will know, is that the same gulf between appearance and interior that makes his stories – "The Enormous Radio", "The Day the Pig Fell into the Well", "Goodbye, My Brother"– so beguiling was also at work in his own life. Despite an increasingly command performance as an upstanding member of the bourgeoisie, Cheever couldn't shake the sense of being essentially an impostor among the middle classes. Writers, even the most socially gifted and established, must be outsiders of some sort, if only because their job is that of scrutiniser and witness. All the same, Cheever's sense of double-dealing seems to have run unusually deep.

This burden of fraudulence, of needing to keep some lumbering secret self forever under wraps, was not merely a matter of class anxiety. Cheever lived in the painful knowledge that his erotic desires included men, that these desires were antagonistic and even fatal to the social security he also craved, and that as such "every comely man, every bank clerk and delivery boy was aimed at my life like a loaded pistol". During this period, his sense of failure and self-disgust could reach such agonising heights that he sometimes raised in his journals the possibility of suicide.

Who wouldn't drink in a situation like that, to ease the pressure of maintaining such intricately folded double lives? He'd been hitting it hard since he first arrived in New York, back in 1943. Even in the depths of poverty he managed to find funds for nights that might, head-splittingly, take in a dozen Manhattans or a quart apiece of whiskey. He drank at home and in friends' apartments, in the Brevoort, the Plaza and the Menemsha Bar on 57th Street, where he'd pop in after collecting his daughter from school and let her eat maraschino cherries while he attended to his needs. Though not all these scenes were exactly civilised, alcohol was an essential ingredient of Cheever's ideal of a cultured life, one of those rites whose correct assumption could protect him from the persistent shadows of inferiority and shame.

Instead, it did just the opposite. By the late 1950s, Cheever was using the word alcoholism to describe his behaviour, writing grimly: "In the morning I am deeply depressed, my insides barely function, my kidney is painful, my hands shake, and walking down Madison Avenue I am in fear of death. But evening comes or even noon and some combination of nervous tensions obscures my memories of what whiskey costs me in the way of physical and intellectual wellbeing. I could very easily destroy myself. It is 10 o'clock now and I am thinking of the noontime snort."

In order to understand how an intelligent man could get himself into such a dire situation, it's necessary to understand what a glass of champagne or shot of scotch does to the human body. Alcohol is both an intoxicant and a central nervous depressant, with an immensely complex effect upon the brain. A single drink brings about a surge of euphoria, followed by a diminishment in fear and agitation caused by a reduction in brain activity. Everyone experiences these effects, and they are the reason alcohol is such a pleasurable drug; the reason why, despite my history, I too love to drink.

But if the drinking is habitual, the brain begins to compensate for these calming effects by producing an increase in excitatory neurotransmitters. What this means in practice is that when one stops drinking, even for a day or two, the increased activity manifests itself by way of an eruption of anxiety, more severe than anything that came before. This neuroadaptation is what drives addiction in the susceptible, eventually making the drinker require alcohol in order to function at all.

Not everyone who drinks, of course, becomes an alcoholic. The disease, which exists in all quarters of the world, is caused by an intricate mosaic of factors, among them genetic predisposition, early life experience and social influences. As it gathers momentum, alcohol addiction inevitably affects the drinker, visibly damaging the architecture of their life. Jobs are lost. Relationships spoil. There may be accidents, arrests and injuries, or the drinker may simply become increasingly neglectful of their responsibilities and capacity to provide self-care. Conditions associated with long-term alcoholism include hepatitis, cirrhosis, gastritis, heart disease, hypertension, impotence, infertility, various types of cancer, increased susceptibility to infection, sleep disorders, loss of memory and personality changes caused by damage to the brain. More stress, of course: to be drowned out in turn by drink after drink after drink.

This is where the black stories start. This is where you find the bloated, feuding Hemingway of the later years, his liver so swollen it protruded from his gut like a long leech. This is where you find F Scott Fitzgerald, washed up in Baltimore in the mid-1930s, his wife in an asylum, writing bad stories drunk and crashing his car into town buildings. And this is where you find the poet John Berryman, esteemed professor, breaking his bones and vomiting in strangers' cars.

I hate these stories. They're true and they're also untrue, and profoundly distorting. What I discovered as I travelled was how ambiguous and contradictory the issue of writers and alcohol really is. On the one hand, there's dissolution and degradation, and on the other there's dogged labour, compulsive honesty and the production of enduring art. Reading Tennessee Williams's diaries while he was writing Cat on a Hot Tin Roof reveals a man in crisis, so profoundly addicted to alcohol that he carried a flask of whiskey wherever he went. And yet the play he produced is a miracle of truth-telling. It seems impossible that in the midst of such confusion and self-harm, Williams was able to produce a play like Cat, with its uncompromising portrayal of the drinker's urge to evade reality. And yet he retained in some unobliterated part of himself the necessary clarity to set down on paper a portrait of the self-deceiving nature of the alcoholic.

He was not the only one, by any means. From Berryman's Dream Songs to Fitzgerald's Tender Is the Night and Hemingway's For Whom the Bell Tolls, there exist dozens of works of art in which an alcoholic writer reflects on their own disease; a disease, furthermore, that is hallmarked by distortions in thinking, particularly denial. When I travelled to Key West to visit Hemingway's house, I kept thinking in particular about a line in For Whom the Bell Tolls that compares alcoholism to "a deadly wheel… it is the thing that drunkards and those who are truly mean or cruel ride until they die."

There was something sickening about that image. I imagined what it might be like to ride such a wheel: the confusion, the gathering sense of entrapment. Impossible not to think of what lay ahead for Hemingway: the long depression, ECT at the Mayo Clinic, the loss of his home in Cuba, his manuscripts and letters, his beloved boat Pilar. He said it was as if he'd lost his life, and on 2 July 1961 he shot himself in Idaho, 19 days before his 62nd birthday. John Berryman, too, who after several failed cycles of treatment for alcohol addiction caught the morning bus to the Washington Avenue bridge in St Paul on Friday 7 January 1972. He climbed the railing and let himself go, falling 100 feet on to a pier and rolling partway down the embankment of the Mississippi river, where his body was later identified by a blank cheque in his pocket and the name on his broken glasses.

These stories weigh on me, and yet an alcoholic can stop drinking. I knew it from my own childhood, and I knew it from my reading. My mother's ex-partner got dry at a treatment centre she still describes as a hellhole, and came back into our lives sober. John Cheever also managed it. "I came out of prison 20 pounds lighter and howling with pleasure," he wrote in a letter to a Russian friend on 2 June 1975, a few weeks after his release from the Smithers Alcohol Treatment and Training Centre in New York City, and though no cure had been found for his loneliness or sense of sexual confusion, he never drank again. Even when he was dying of cancer, even when all but one of his doctors said he might as well go back on the bottle, he elected to stay dry. For the last seven years of his life he was stone cold sober: still depressed, still at the mercy of his erections, but also in possession of his wit, and the old, magical capacity for being unsprung by joy.

The writer whose sobriety most interested me, however, was Raymond Carver. I'd come across his poems long ago, and been struck by the praiseful way he wrote about his second life: the one in which alcohol was no longer the dominating force. When I'd first thought of taking a trip to America, I knew immediately I wanted to end in Port Angeles, the town on the Olympic Peninsula that had nourished his sobriety.

It's almost impossible to overestimate the hardship of Carver's early adulthood, in which he struggled to educate himself and get food on the table while stealing every spare minute in which to write. In such straitened circumstances, it's not difficult to understand why alcohol might have begun to seem like an ally, or else a key to a locked door. His father had drunk to escape the monotony of work and to ease the pressures of survival. For Ray, there was also bitterness to choke back; bitterness and self-reproach and a sense of spoiling time. These are the sort of things that can sour in your head if you're still working as a janitor at 27, swabbing corridors in Mercy hospital. And these are the sort of things you might try to soothe in the Fireside Lounge on H Street, knocking back a boilermaker at the end of the night shift, readying up for another day with your own exhausting children.

There's no doubt the odds were stacked against him; but nor is there much doubt that he became, six days out of seven, his own worst enemy. The things Carver did seem so senselessly self-destructive. One Raymond – Good Raymond, I suppose – would get on to a master's programme, or find a decent job, and the other Raymond, the perverse, malevolent one, would somehow conspire to mess it up. He published three volumes of poems during his drinking years, and wrote almost 40 short stories, among them "Will You Please Be Quiet, Please?", "Tell the Women We're Going", "Dummy" and "So Much Water So Close to Home". At the same time he was unreliable, paranoid and violent; by his own description a bankrupt, a cheat, a thief and a liar. As for creativity, as he approached the nadir of his drinking he could barely write at all.

Good Raymond emerged from the wreckage slowly, like a man struggling from a sm ashed car. He spent a long time shuttling through recovery, getting dry and then going straight back out to drink. Early on, during the bad years in California, he had a seizure on the floor just as he was about to leave a treatment centre, smashing his forehead open. The doctor warned him that if he ever drank again he risked becoming a wet-brain, a graphic term for alcoholic brain damage. According to his wife, he spent that evening "sucking brandy from a bottle as if it were Pepsi, his stitches concealed under a bandage, indifferent to the doctor's warning".

In 1976 his first volume of stories, Will You Please Be Quiet, Please?, was published. That same year he checked into Duffy's, a private treatment centre in Napa that was later the setting for "Where I'm Calling From". The programme consisted of frequent AA meetings and controlled withdrawal by way of hummers, progressively weaker shots of rotgut bourbon in water, doled out every three hours for three days. Shortly after his release, he announced that he understood he could never drink hard liquor again, and would in future stick to André champagne.

Unsurprisingly, he was back again weeks later, checking himself in on New Year's Eve. It was his last pass through formal treatment. That spring he left his family and rented a house alone, overlooking the Pacific. For the next few months he went to AA meetings and tried, not always successfully, to maintain his balance on the wagon. The turning point came in May, when he was offered an advance of $5,000 for a novel. He was in the midst of a bender at the time, but four days later took his final drink in the Jambalaya bar. "June 2nd 1977", he remembered in the Paris Review. "If you want the truth, I'm prouder of that, that I've quit drinking, than I am of anything in my life. I'm a recovered alcoholic. I'll always be an alcoholic, but I'm no longer a practising alcoholic."

Slowly, over the next two years, he backed away from his family, whose ongoing troubles he felt certain were capable of scuttling his recovery. For a while he barely wrote, and then the new stories started coming; stories infused with "little human connections"; stories he'd "come back from the grave" to write. In the summer of 1978, he fell in love with the poet Tess Gallagher, the protector and companion of his second life. At the time, she'd just built a house in her home town of Port Angeles, and at the tail end of 1982 Ray moved in. It was in this period that he produced – though he might have preferred caught – clutch after clutch of poems, slippery and pristine as the dream salmon he sometimes encountered on his nights in town.

I'd read one of them so many times I'd almost worn a track in it. It's called "Where Water Comes Together With Other Water". "I love creeks and the music they make," the narrator begins, and then lists, exultantly, all the other waterways he knows, and the enlarging effects they have on his heart. He describes how barren his life was 10 years back, and ends with a characteristically heartfelt, sawn-off sentence, a kind of credo or manifesto: "Loving everything that increases me."

You could live like that all right, especially if you'd once felt, as he did, that every action you took was poisoning further the wellsprings of your life. It could be read, in fact, as a kind of boiled-down, idiosyncratic version of the third step of Alcoholics Anonymous – Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him. It has the same faith in enlargement, in the possibility of benediction from oblique and unexpected sources.

On my last day in Port Angeles, I went out to Ocean View cemetery to visit Carver's grave. There were pines at the edge of the field, and beyond them the land dropped away, falling 400 feet or so to the water beneath. I could hear the waves moving very softly, a lush, lulling, impossibly rich sound. In September 1987 Carver was out there on his boat with a friend when they looked up and saw a group of people on the bluff. "I think they're planting somebody up there," he said, and turned his attention back to the sea. He'd been coughing all month but wouldn't know for another few weeks that there were malignant tumours in his lungs.

The sky was glazed with clouds, like curds and whey. I saw his headstone immediately. I recognised it from photographs: black marble, with the poem "Late Fragment" carved on it. It's a poem about love and self-acceptance; about gratitude and miracles. Carver once said he didn't believe in God, "but I have to believe in miracles and the possibility of resurrection. No question about that. Every day that I wake up, I'm glad to wake up."

I stood by that grave for a long time, thinking about alcohol, and the trouble it brings. There's a saying in AA that addiction isn't your fault but recovery is your responsibility. It sounds simple enough but making that step is about as easy as standing up and dancing on a sheet of black ice. In Cat on a Hot Tin Roof, Brick says to his dying father: "It's hard for me to understand how anybody could care if he lived or died or was dying or cared about anything but whether or not there was liquor left in the bottle."

Imagine feeling like that. And then imagine sitting down at your typewriter every morning, day after day, year after year. It was Cheever's words I thought of then. In 1969, when he was still in the thickets of his own addiction, he was asked if he felt godlike at the typewriter. What he answered seemed to me to sum up the ambiguity of writers and alcoholism, the difficulty of passing judgment on lives at once so troubled and so blessed. "No, I've never felt godlike," he said. "No, the sense is of one's total usefulness. We all have a power of control, it's part of our lives: we have it in love, in work that we love doing. It's a sense of ecstasy, as simple as that… In short, you've made sense of your life."

© Olivia Laing. This is an edited extract from The Trip to Echo Spring, published by Canongate Reported by guardian.co.uk 20 hours ago.

Hair today: straight or curly?

$
0
0
For years now, straight hair has been the female ideal. But curls are back, along with short crops, rattails, dip dyes... Elizabeth Day throws away the straighteners – and asks what our changing style says about us

Like many addictions, it starts as a psychological prop, a way of making yourself feel more confident in social situations. At first you only do it on a night out because everyone else does. But then you become dependent. Before you know it, you're indulging first thing in the morning and then in the loo at work when you think no one's looking. You do it after the gym and even on holiday. You forget what you were like before the addiction took hold. The idea of living without it sends a shiver of cold terror down your spine.

I talk not of narcotics, alcohol or cigarettes. I talk instead of something that millions of women can relate to on an everyday basis: the simple act of straightening one's hair.

Over the past decade, ironed-straight hair has become almost the default style for white females of a certain age. At some point in the early noughties, it seemed we all signed up to the cult of the poker-straight. Our obsession was fuelled by advances in technology and the ready availability of salon-quality straighteners on the high street. When ceramic-plated GHD hair straighteners first hit the shelves, we rushed en masse to grab a pair capable of transforming our frizzy mops into long, sleek manes worthy of a member of Atomic Kitten. Everyone was doing it. Even Jennifer Aniston, propagator of that iconic layered mid-90s haircut "The Rachel", went straight.

In the grip of our addiction we didn't care about the damage done to our split ends or the occasional forehead burn or the times we had to dash back to the house, panicked that we'd left our straighteners on and they were burning a hole through the carpet.

I was no exception. With my straighteners I could iron the natural kink out of my hair in five minutes every morning. It was quicker and easier than getting a blow-dry. When I started my first job on a newspaper, I told myself that straight hair looked more professional than my customary tangle. Soon the straighteners were just another part of my morning routine. I was so attached to them I once took a pair on assignment to Mali – even though I was staying in a hotel with no electricity. For the best part of a decade I was a slave to the straightener. I didn't think to question my subservience because everyone else was doing it, too.

But now something strange is happening. Silently, stealthily, a generation of women has emerged from under the steaming shadow of 230C heat. And hair has once again become something to experiment with. Blow-dry bars have sprung up in city centres. Extensions are something you do to your scalp rather than the side-return of your house. A battery of gadgetry has reached salon shelves: curling tongs and hot rollers and hair extensions and Argan oil and dry shampoo. Pop stars such as Katy Perry and Kelly Osbourne are dyeing their hair shocking pink and purple. Lady Gaga wears oversize bows made of hair. Women grow fringes to be like Lou Doillon, sport undercuts to emulate Rihanna and style peroxide-blonde mohicans in homage to Emeli Sandé, and no one bats an eyelid.

"It's not one, iconic haircut any more," explains Luke Hersheson, an award-winning stylist and a brand ambassador for L'Oréal Kérastase. "People used to embrace having the same haircut as Jennifer Aniston. Now there are 20 or 30 new trends, and individuality is so much more important."

Hersheson says that social networks such as Twitter and Instagram, which enable celebrities to establish direct relationships with their fans, have meant that we are now able to leap on new trends far more quickly.

"We've always had celebrity influence, but the world's a lot smaller," Hersheson says. "When I  was starting out in the early 90s, the only way I could find out what was happening was to assist hairdressers at a catwalk show. Those pictures were not released to the public for six months. Now I just go home and log on. The accessibility has changed massively."

Today hair is once again becoming a statement of individualism. Just in time, as it happens, because a few weeks ago my straighteners broke and my hair reverted to its untampered state: a nondescript wave that is neither one thing nor the other.

But the odd thing was that I no longer felt leaving the house without straightened hair was the visual equivalent of going out in public missing some vital item of clothing. Instead my female acquaintances were overwhelmingly positive.

My cousin said my hair looked better than she'd ever seen it. Some – like my friend Olivia – were almost affronted that I'd been hiding my curls from them for so long, as though I'd been leading a follicular double life. "You should leave your hair exactly as it is," Olivia insisted. "Throw the straighteners out."

The men I know were less sure. They thought my hair made me seem "a bit zany – like Minnie Driver". One male acquaintance cited Anita Roddick. My husband diplomatically said he liked it both curly and straight, which is basically why I married him. Interestingly, everyone I spoke to believed it made me look younger.

For women, hair is a tricky business. Straight or curly, it comes loaded with cultural meaning – a social symbol that, unlike clothing, is an intrinsic part of the body and one which grows on a daily basis.

"Hair is called a secondary sexual characteristic," says Philip Kingsley, one of the UK's leading trichologists, and the man who coined the term "bad hair day". "You can't flaunt your primary sexual characteristics in public, at least not in western society, so that's what makes your hair so important from a social viewpoint: it's about sexuality and morale. Lots of women, and men, find that if they are not happy with their hair then they are unhappy people."

Hair is a genetic inheritance, a marker of our biological roots, and yet the vast majority of us manipulate it through our lifetimes. The styling of our hair is, says Dr Sarah Cheang, a senior tutor at the Royal College of Art, a form of "social signalling". According to Cheang, who co-edited the book Hair: Styling, Culture and Fashion, our impulse to straighten, dye or curl our hair comes from a psychological need to disguise who we really are. When hair continues to grow, it threatens to betray our biological roots or our so-called "natural" identity to others.

"We may have decided that our 'true' or 'correct' identity should be something else," she says. "Thus hair might need to be dyed, bleached, straightened, curled or hastily removed."

As a result we bombard our hair with treatments. We allow it to affect our moods, and we treat it as a means of both adornment and self-expression. When we lose it – through alopecia or chemotherapy – the trauma is intense.

The issue becomes even more complex for black women, for whom straight hair can often only be achieved through great expense, the application of dangerous chemicals and the endurance of physical pain. Straightening the natural texture of black people's hair has been perceived as pacifying a culture dominated by white ideals of beauty – but that is another, even more politically charged story.

All of this contributes to the fact that the average woman in the UK spends £26,500 on her tresses over her lifetime. A quarter of the respondents to a 2010 poll of 3,000 people said they would rather spend money on their hair than food. And although the grim economic climate has seen visits to hair salons drop off, an increasing number of women are styling their hair at home.

A consumer report by Mintel states that ownership of hair-styling products has expanded by 4.4 million adults between 2007-10. Twenty million women own a hair dryer and more than 5 million own straighteners (25% of whom say they couldn't live without them).

But why do we bother? Why do we feel this need to tamper with our hair? Hersheson sees it as part of an inherent human covetousness: "It's part of our being to want something we haven't got. We've got a natural, built-in desire to enhance, change or experiment."

This could be true. A natural brunette, I remember being desperate to have blonde hair as a teenager because it seemed that all the boys fancied Pamela Anderson. It turns out there is plenty of historical precedent for blondes being more admired. The Edwardian explorer M French Sheldon claimed to have dazzled the locals in East Africa in 1906 with a white gown and a long blonde wig that apparently rendered her all-powerful and untouchable. But colour is a fluid concept.

"Blondeness used to be a sign of youth," says fashion historian Caroline Cox. "Now, because so many women post-50 are dyeing their hair blonde, it's a sign of maturity, and young women are increasingly dyeing their hair in a grey tone that's almost silver or pale blue."

Hair cut, too, has long been a social signifier. When the bob gained popularity in the 1920s it was emblematic of a new era of modernity and women's emancipation in the aftermath of the First World War – a literal cutting-off from outdated Edwardian traditions. In the 1960s both men and women grew their hair long to rebel against accepted establishment norms. In the 1980s the first wave of women in the workplace often cut their hair short in order to fit into a male-dominated environment (in Working Girl, Mike Nichols's 1988 film about a secretary who yearns to become a businesswoman, there is a seminal moment in which the protagonist, Tess, is so desperate to be taken seriously that she cuts off her soft blonde hair).

These days, according to Cox, the dominant trend is for styling rather than cutting, and for "glamorous, long hair, and lots of it". It is a look that crosses the social divide and yet simultaneously emphasises it. There is an assumption that pneumatic glamour models and female cast members of Towie rely on "fake" hair extensions, whereas the luscious natural locks of the Duchess of Cambridge bespeak a woman with the time and money to devote to a deluxe blow-dry.

Other famous proponents of the glossy mane include the caramel-tinted Kim Sears – when her boyfriend Andy Murray won Wimbledon, the BBC devoted almost as many camera angles to capturing the rippling movements of Kim's astonishing hair as it did to the tennis. As a result of this trend, the UK is now the third largest importer of human hair in the world, with £38m worth entering the country in 2011 and a 70% market growth in the last five years. There are even reports of Russian prisoners having their heads shaved against their will and the harvesting of hair from corpses to meet the surge in demand.

"It's a traditional idea of female glamour and it's kind of boring," says Cox. "It's the whole pole-dancer look: huge heads of artificial hair, faces that look as if they've been dipped in a bucket of make-up, ultra short skirts and huge stripper heels. In terms of fashion and feminism, it's like: oh my God – what was I fighting for?"

Big, fake hair has reached the workplace, too – as evidenced by the female candidates on the recent series of The Apprentice, one of whom made repeated references to her "voluminous" bleached-blonde locks on her CV.

Karin Lesnik-Oberstein, a professor of critical theory at the University of Reading and editor of The Last Taboo: Women and Body Hair, sees this as part of a broader trend towards cosmetic enhancement.

"There's an idea now that the more successful a woman is, the more glamorous and sexy she should be," she says. "If not, she has sacrificed her femininity. It's the same with cosmetic surgery or Botox. It goes with the idea of 'having it all' – because if you're a boss and also a woman who doesn't comply with trying to look sexually attractive, then really you're like a man and you become a castrated bitch."

And because the semiotics of a woman's hair are so complex, so inextricably linked with the story she wants to tell about herself and so shaped by the outside forces of gender, commerce and culture, it is truly shocking when someone subverts the narrative.

When Britney Spears shaved her head in full public view in 2007, it was viewed as disturbing physical evidence of a mental breakdown. And although in recent years it has become more common for women to have partially shaved heads as fashion statements, it remains rare to see a female celebrity embracing a full buzz cut unless it is for charity (as Jesse J did to raise money for Red Nose Day) or professional reasons (as Charlize Theron did for an upcoming role).

"Short hair is still equated with masculinity," says Lesnik-Oberstein. "I have very short hair, and in England I often get mistaken for a man. It happened to me recently with two older ladies who mistook me for a man in the loo and said: 'Sir, this is a ladies' loo' very politely. They were mortified when I told them I was actually a woman. That never happens to me on the continent – for instance in Germany or Holland, where a lot of these societies are more egalitarian and matriarchal."

By contrast the looseness of long hair is said to suggest both a moral looseness and a natural sensuality – it was partly for this reason that Victorian women only ever "let their hair down" in private and why many religious faiths still require women to cover their heads completely. Long hair recurs frequently in fairy tales as a metaphor for sexuality, serving to remind us how close and how distant we are from the animal within, whereas tied-up hair is used in popular culture to denote the sexually repressed or uptight.

According to Harvard academic Thom Hecht, "disciplined" hair symbolises "the unseen disciplined mind". In his essay "Hair Control: the Feminine Disciplined Head", he explains that a ballerina's swept-back chignon reflects the supreme physical control exercised over her own body.

All of which could explain why, when I had my hair styled in a tight ponytail for the shoot accompanying this feature, most people who saw me thought I looked "unapproachable" (which might simply be a polite way of saying: "You looked like you had a rattail and a Croydon facelift"). By contrast, the hairstyle with natural waves was deemed the most likeable. Poker-straight hair was, the photographer said, "cold and expressionless".

But for me, the biggest revelation was how liberated I felt with curly hair. There was something about the lightness of it, the way it bounced as I walked, that made me feel happier – perhaps because I wasn't spending the entire day worrying about whether my hair would frizz hideously if it made contact with water. And I suppose it felt more natural, too, less like I was trying to be something I'm not.

But "naturalness", says Sarah Cheang is "a socially constructed concept like any other". That is to say, because hair grows continuously, the management of it whether by cutting or styling is – and always has been – an essential part of human social existence.

And in truth I'm not sure I'll be ditching the hair straighteners immediately. I definitely feel more comfortable experimenting with different styles than I used to, but I'm not sure I'm quite ready to abandon a decade's worth of personal grooming experience. It's going to be a gradual process of weaning myself off the GHDs before I get myself back on to the straight and narrow. In a manner of speaking, that is. Reported by guardian.co.uk 19 hours ago.

From The Returned to Broadchurch to Game of Thrones: the best TV of 2013

$
0
0
There has been a feast of gripping TV series to follow so far this year. Guardian writers reveal what has glued them to the screen

**The Returned** *(Channel 4)*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

Everything is unsettling. The town is both concrete and imagined, a place where all roads lead nowhere. The only arrivals are the dead, though it's never entirely clear who is alive and who is dead. The Returned takes many of the familiar killer zombie tropes and gives them an unfamiliar twist. You think losing a child or a partner may be the worst thing that could happen? This drama series makes you wonder whether having them back might be worse. It's an existential pain evenly shared between the living and the dead. No one really understands the rules of engagement: not the living, not the dead. And certainly not this viewer. All I know for sure is you're best off avoiding the underpass. *John* *Crace*

**Endeavour** *(ITV)
*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

This year has been all about exciting gritty modern TV dramas. The Returned. The Fall. Everything starring Olivia Colman. Hurrah for modern TV! So, naturally, my favourite show is Endeavour, the programme that makes you feel as if the past 13 years never happened. Undoubtedly, a large part of the show's appeal is sentimentality. I adored Morse and just hearing Barrington Pheloung's tune on TV again prompted a Proustian thrill. But Endeavour did not coast on sentiment. Shaun Evans was brilliant as young Morse, with a face that looks more like John Thaw the more you look at it. Then there's Roger Allam – a man I would watch in anything – as his superior. The two gave Endeavour classiness rarely seen in Sunday night dramas. Not seen, in fact, since Morse. Modern and gritty are all very well, but comfort and class are irresistible. *Hadley Freeman*

**Broadchurch** *(ITV)
*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

Chris Chibnall's scripts for Broadchurch contained one of the darkest and most original scenes in TV drama: when Olivia Colman's DS Ellie Miller confronted in an interview room a killer on whose family background she would need no briefing. The show confirmed Colman as a pretender to Julie Walters' throne as Britain's most versatile and admired small-screen performers, and satisfyingly proved wrong almost all current theories about how TV works. At a time when the fashion was for "stripping" a series across one week and Netflix was encouraging viewers to watch House of Cards at a time of their own choosing, Broadchurch kept and built an audience across eight weekly episodes, in the manner of the past. *Mark Lawson*

**The Good Wife** *(More4)*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

The Good Wife is technically a legal procedural, I suppose. The protagonist, Alicia Florrick, is a fortysomething mother of two forced to go back to work when her politician husband Peter has the kibosh put on his career when his use of prostitutes is revealed. But what unfolds over the next four-seasons-and-counting is a drama that is given its emotional heft by the loving, nuanced, realistic portrait of a marriage shattering and then slowly being put back together. It also has complex, fully realised characters of a kind more usually associated with niche cable shows rather than network series such as The Good Wife. This would be good enough, but the fact that women outnumber the men makes it glorious. There's Diane, the co-founding partner at Alicia's law firm, who is neither bitch nor secretly unfulfilled nor shrew; Alicia herself, an almost uniquely stoic female character; Kalinda, who – well, she just kicks ass in every way, don't get me started; Peter's mother, who sits like a sweetly smiling spider in the middle of the domestic web; and even the Florricks' 14-year-old daughter is not a screaming teenage cipher but a thoughtful and considered player in this increasingly brilliant ensemble piece. *Lucy Mangan*

**In the Flesh** *(BBC3)
*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

Closer in emotional tone to The Returned than the shoot-'em-up mayhem of The Walking Dead, TV debutant and writing-scheme beneficiary Dominic Mitchell's rural Lancashire zombie drama wittily recast its undead as "partially deceased syndrome sufferers", and used social satire and brain-scooping horror to place ancient fears in a modern setting with hot-button themes of intolerance, integration and BBC3's signature war in Afghanistan. Newcomer Luke Newberry's government-assisted rehabilitation after his gay-shame suicide is reversed during the mysterious "rising". Scary, moving and funny, it pulled 600,000 viewers to BBC3, with the channel providing inventive online support, and won a recommission, proving that zombies do come back. *Andrew Collins*

**The Americans** *(ITV)*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

A belting US import doing the business for ITV on Saturday nights. Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell play Soviet agents Philip and Elizabeth Jennings, living as a suburban Washington couple in Reagan's America. Even their kids don't know who they really are and we meet them just as a nosy FBI agent moves in across the street. The constant peril of discovery propels every episode as they try to gather intel, and Phil begins to go native and starts line dancing. While Russell is kept busy snapping enemy necks and grooming her 80s side-sweep, Rhys's face dominates: the contrast turned up to 11 on his pale skin and black brows with cheekbones that could slice kielbasa. Truly thrilling. *Julia Raeside*

**House of Cards** *(Netflix)*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

When the entire series of House of Cards arrived on Netflix in one go this year, everyone was so caught up in discussing its impact on traditional television that they forgot to talk about what the show was actually like. This is a shame. At its best, House of Cards was magnificent. A gleaming, sumptuous political drama that made its BBC predecessor look like provincial am-dram, House of Cards was underpinned by Kevin Spacey's remarkable slow-motion Foghorn Leghorn turn as scheming majority whip, Frank Underwood. The whole thing bordered perilously on self-parody at times – especially during the clanging product placement of the infamous "Say, is that a PSP Vita?" scene – but that added to its charm. *Stuart Heritage*

**The Fall *(BBC2)
*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

The small screen's growing appetite for serial killers is not necessarily to be celebrated, but BBC2 drama The Fall was a claustrophobic, unsettling and utterly gripping watch. A "whydunnit" rather than a whodunnit, The Fall turned The Killing on its head, with much of its focus on the family man by day/psychopath by night, Paul Spector (Jamie Dornan). If Dornan was good, then Gillian Anderson, as the glacial armour-plated DS Stella Gibson, was even better. "The most repulsive drama ever broadcast on British TV," said the Daily Mail. If at times it made the viewer feel complicit in Spector's crimes, then it also made them confront, in Gibson's words, the "age old [issue of] male violence against women". Grown-up drama, without a weak link, and with no resolution. Not until the second series, at least. *John Plunkett*

**Game of Thrones** *(Sky Atlantic)
*

Scintillating moments from season three: Brienne of Tarth's terrifying fight with a CGI bear, the ice-wall ascent, the slaughter of House Stark, any scene featuring Peter Dinklage's randy, dissolute dwarf, Cersei's expression when brother-lover Jamie made it home minus a hand but with his gorgeousness otherwise sickeningly intact. How good is Game of Thrones? Almost good enough to make me sign a peace treaty with Rupert Murdoch's evil empire and subscribe to Sky Atlantic. I said almost. While The White Queen is supposed to be about the Wars of the Roses and Game of Thrones merely cherry picks it for material, the latter feels more authentic, its filth and fornication less 21st century than Philippa Gregory, author of The White Queen, dared. Can't wait for season four. *Stuart Jeffries*

**Dates** *(Channel 4)
*

I didn't expect to fall for Dates. I came with low expectations, only there for a bit of fun, but after one evening with Oona Chaplin's smouldering Mia and Will Mellor's weary David, I was halfway in love. It's one of those bold pieces of programming that shouldn't work: slow, dialogue-heavy vignettes, peeling back the layers to reveal complex, damaged characters, like a sexy British answer to Louis Malle's My Dinner with André. The scripts were smart, naturalistic, funny and full of surprises, brought to life in thoughtful performances from a cracking cast, with bewitching turns from Montanna Thompson, Sian Breckin and Andrew Scott in non-recurring roles. Sometimes things just click. *Tom Meltzer*

**Orange is the New Black** *(Netflix)
*

Reading this on mobile? Click here to view video

The trailer didn't look promising – Waspy blonde gets sent to the slammer where she learns how hard life is for poor black people – but this comedy-drama is finely balanced, funny, sharp and easy to love. It takes the usual prison TV tropes of bent screws, lesbian affairs, claustrophobic pettiness and racial divides, and makes them seem fresh, skewing our perspectives in unexpected ways. It's also a delight to have a show that not only passes the Bechdel test but goes straight to the top of the league table, telling the stories of a broad variety of women's lives without ever feeling tokenistic. I devoured all 13 episodes in a weekend; thankfully a second season is due next year. *Rebecca Nicholson* Reported by guardian.co.uk 9 hours ago.

Olivia Colman Struggling With New-found Fame

$
0
0
British actress Olivia Colman is struggling to come to terms with her new-found fame after a slew of awards in recent months forced her into the... Reported by ContactMusic 5 hours ago.

Brandt Snedeker Wins Canadian Open

$
0
0
Brandt Snedeker Wins Canadian Open OAKVILLE, Ontario— Zoe Olivia Mahan can expect something special from Brandt Snedeker.

Snedeker won the Canadian Open on Sunday, a day after Hunter Mahan withdrew with the lead before the third round when his wife went into labor. Kandi Mahan …

The post Brandt Snedeker Wins Canadian Open appeared first on The Epoch Times. Reported by Epoch Times 49 minutes ago.

Brandt Snedeker wins the Canadian Open

$
0
0
OAKVILLE, Ontario -- Zoe Olivia Mahan can expect something special from Brandt Snedeker. Snedeker won the Canadian Open on Sunday, a day after Hunter Mahan withdrew with the lead before the third round when his wife went into labor. Kandi Mahan gave birth to daughter Zoe Olivia early Sunday in Texas. Reported by azcentral.com 1 hour ago.

Olivia Jordan-Higgins Wins Symetra Tour Event

$
0
0
SYRACUSE, N.Y.— Jersey’s Olivia Jordan-Higgins won the Credit Union Classic on Sunday for her first Symetra Tour victory, holding off Thailand’s P.K. Kongkraphan by a stroke.

Jordan-Higgins, a former Charleston Southern player, shot a 1-over 72 in the round delayed …

The post Olivia Jordan-Higgins Wins Symetra Tour Event appeared first on The Epoch Times. Reported by Epoch Times 49 minutes ago.

Olivia Jordan-Higgins wins Symetra Tour event

$
0
0
SYRACUSE, New York (AP) Olivia Jordan-Higgins won the Credit Union Classic on Sunday for her first Symetra Tour victory, holding off Thailand's P.K. Kongkraphan by a stroke.Jordan-Higgins shot a 1-over 72 in the round delayed 4... Reported by New Zealand Herald 1 hour ago.

So You've Failed -- Masterclash and Asylum Say Goodbye

$
0
0
Filed under: Humor, Entertainment, Video, Masterclash


The time has come to say goodbye. There were robots and nerdy burlesques and everything Star Wars. We gave you A Woman's Perspective and had Drinks With Writers. Olivia Munn pranked our intern. We banned Megan Fox and encouraged women to have Sex ... Read more

 

Permalink | Email this | Linking Blogs | Comments Reported by Asylum 33 minutes ago.

Sports Shorts

$
0
0
GOLF: Oh, baby! Snedeker wins Zoe Olivia Mahan can expect something special from Brandt Snedeker. Snedeker won the Canadian Open yesterday, a day after Hunter Mahan withdrew with the lead before the third round when his wife went into labor. Kandi Mahan gave birth to daughter Zoe Olivia early yesterday... Reported by NY Post 21 hours ago.

The Most Charming Indie Of The Summer

$
0
0
Joe Swanberg has become a fixture on the indie film scene over the last eight years thanks to mumblecore hallmarks like "LOL,""Hannah Takes The Stairs" and "Alexander The Last." His latest feature, "Drinking Buddies," combines the script-free natural approach of those earlier movies with a Hollywood dream cast: Olivia Wilde, Jake Johnson, Ron Livingston and Anna Kendrick all star in the film, which tells the story of two co-workers at a brewery who might be more than just friends.

"The point I want to make clear is that this movie is called an improvised movie a lot, but our director was the captain of the ship," Johnson said after the "Drinking Buddies" premiere at SXSW in March. "It was a really nice thing. We would all talk things out, but it wasn't a situation where we'd show up on set and we'd say, 'My character's going to do this today!' There was a clear vision from start to finish."

"Drinking Buddies" is available now on iTunes and other on-demand services. "The easier it has gotten to make movies, the harder it has become to get anybody to see them," Swanberg told HuffPost Entertainment last week. "So, VOD is just an incredibly useful tool in that way." (Magnolia will release "Drinking Buddies" in theaters on Aug. 23.)

Below, an edited transcript of a conversation with Swanberg about "Drinking Buddies," his most important role as a director and what he really thinks of Hollywood in 2013.

*Without a traditional script, casting is so important here: How much went into putting this cast together?*
Casting is the most important thing I can do for a film. I value the cast above all other elements, by a lot. If I do a good job casting, then the rest of my life is very easy. I got really lucky here. I ended up not only with incredible actors, but incredible actors who got along very well together. They created a chemistry and a dynamic in this movie that's really exciting.

*You get these very natural performances from everyone -- especially Jake and Anna. Is it a case where you just get out of their way and let them perform?*
My first job is to sort of set the tone and create an atmosphere. I'm trying to create a safe space for these people to feel really comfortable sharing. I don't want them to feel like there are wrong answers to any of the questions. Even when you're a professional actor who has been doing it for forever, it's still a really vulnerable position to be in. It's a hard job. It's often an embarrassing job -- you're performing in front of people who may or may not appreciate that. You're sort of putting yourself out there. It helps that I act in other peoples' movies, and I'm constantly reminded of that vulnerability. The other thing that I have to do is just reassure them constantly that they're giving me material that's helpful for the movie and that I appreciate them being there. It sounds simple, but it goes a long way to remind someone -- even someone who is a famous movie star -- that they're good at what they do. I'm happy that they're working with me.

*How did the cast come together?*
It was actually Jake who came on first. He was recommended by Lizzy Caplan who had done a couple of episodes of "New Girl." She sort of told me that he was an exciting actor and that she had a really good time working with him. So I just had breakfast with him -- we happened to be in L.A. at the same time. We started talking and then there was a slow process of emails and a sharing of ideas. In the meantime, we were trying to raise financing and I was meeting with other actors. Skype is sort of the way that a lot of that happens these days. I met Olivia, Anna and Ron all for the first time over Skype. It was really cool because there was no script. We just got to have conversations. I told them, thematically, some of the things I was interested in. I asked them about their lives. I didn't know at the time, but Olivia said it at SXSW, that it was Jason Sudeikis who knew my stuff and sort of encouraged her to watch some of my movies and get in touch. The whole thing felt very nice and fortunate. I ended up with a lot of great people in a very casual way. Not in a calculated, Hollywood-y kind of way.

*This film is a leap for you -- the cast is filled with recognizable stars, it looks beautiful thanks to cinematographer Ben Richardson ("Beasts of the Southern Wild"). The New York Times wrote about "Drinking Buddies" and said that "Joe Swanberg grows up." Do you feel that way or is that a backhanded compliment?*
Yeah, you know, certainly I'm so used to that kind of compliment at this point that I wouldn't even recognize it anymore. The movie feels different, I think. It was certainly a new challenge for me. It's cool that people are responding to that and that it has a different feel for them. I understand why it does, especially for a lot of people who haven't liked the other movies but do like this one. It's opening its arms to the audience in a different way than the others, and that's something I'm really proud of and excited about. It's something I was trying to do. Without talking down to the other movies, because I love them all and wouldn't change anything about them, but a lot of them were very personal and -- to me -- felt a little bit like a monologue more than a dialogue. With "Drinking Buddies," I really wanted it to be a dialogue with the audience. I wanted to have a different kind of conversation. I think people are recognizing that.

*You're very outspoken on Twitter about problems with the film industry. Do you agree with Steven Spielberg and George Lucas that the industry is headed toward a cliff?*
I don't know about that. I think this industry has proven that it's very good at making money. I'm not sure that I see one summer where everything tanks and the whole business goes under. But it is a little frustrating to have your only options part two of one movie or part four of another movie. It's certainly not the kind of environment that made me fall in love with movies. It's cool if the lesson that they take away that it's a smarter business to get into making things like "Insidious" and "Pain and Gain" -- $20-25 million movies rather than $200 million movies. I think that would be good for everybody

*Would you want to direct a studio film?*
Sure. I'm open to it. I wouldn't have been. There was certainly a time in my career when I would have been very closed off to that idea, but I'm kind of taking everything that comes and exploring every opportunity. I'm 31 years old, so I'm ready to say exactly what kind of filmmaker I want to be. I'm ready to be open to opportunities right now. It would be nice -- it's all a learning experience. Everything is part of a skill set. It would be nice to know how to direct a car chase sequence or big musical number. I'm interested in that. Reported by Huffington Post 14 hours ago.

Olivia Wilde was scared of love

$
0
0
Olivia Wilde was reluctant to fall in love again after her marriage failed.The 'Rush' actress split from her husband of eight years, Tao Ruspoli, in... Reported by ContactMusic 9 hours ago.
Viewing all 14904 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>